Welcome to GenXFemHealth
Join thousands of Gen X women getting evidence-based health insights on perimenopause, nutrition, strength, and living vibrantly after 40. Enter your email to stay connected.
No spam, ever. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.
April 26, 2026
A note before we begin: Everything I am about to share is my personal opinion. I am not a clinician. I am not diagnosing anyone. What I am is someone who has known this person for twenty years and dated him on and off for thirteen of them. I am, as far as I can tell, one of only a handful of people who truly knows him — along with his ex-wife, and perhaps his sister to some extent. What I have is not a clinical credential. What I have is two decades of watching the same patterns repeat themselves across every area of his life, and the research I eventually did to understand what I was seeing. The name I found for it is Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Whether or not that label is clinically accurate, I cannot say with certainty. What I can say is that it described what I witnessed more precisely than anything else I found. Take it as one woman's hard-won perspective, earned over twenty years. Not a medical conclusion.
There is a person you have probably loved. Maybe you are still loving them.
They are charming when things are going their way and combustible when they are not. They do not follow rules — not because they are lazy, but because rules feel like a personal insult. They drive too fast. They drink too much. They cheat. They blow up relationships that were actually good. And when you ask them why, they look at you like you are the problem for asking.
I know this person. I loved this person. And it took me longer than I want to admit to understand that what I was watching was not a character flaw or a bad patch or something that love could fix. It had a name.
Oppositional Defiant Disorder — ODD — is typically diagnosed in children. Eight-year-olds who argue with every teacher. Twelve-year-olds who refuse to follow any rule that wasn't their own idea. The kid who has to be right, always, about everything, even when being right costs them everything.
But what happens when that child grows up and nobody ever named what was happening inside them? What happens when defiance becomes a lifestyle?
The clinical definition describes ODD as a persistent pattern of angry and irritable mood, argumentative and defiant behavior, and vindictiveness. It clusters into three recognizable types: the person who is chronically angry and easily set off; the person who argues with every authority figure and refuses to comply with any request that feels like a demand; and the person who is spiteful, who keeps score, who will burn something down just to prove they can. Most adults with undiagnosed ODD carry all three.
What makes it so hard to see — especially in the people we love — is that it does not always look like a disorder. It looks like confidence. It looks like someone who doesn't take any crap. It looks like a person who knows their own mind. And in small doses, in the right contexts, those qualities are genuinely attractive. The problem is that they do not come in small doses. They come in every dose, in every context, at every cost.
The most defining feature of the ODD adult is not the anger, and it is not even the defiance. It is the belief — deep, unshakeable, and largely unconscious — that the rules were never meant for them.
Not tax law. Not traffic law. Not the social contract that says you honor your commitments, pay what you owe, and do not spend money that belongs to someone else. These are constructs for other people. People who need to be managed. People who are not as smart, as special, as fundamentally different as they are.
The man I am writing about had not paid his taxes in four years. Not because he could not afford to. Not because he did not understand the process. Because paying felt like submission. Like admitting that the government had a claim on him. And he did not accept claims.
What he did instead was live on his gross income. Every dollar that came in went out — on travel, on bar tabs, on a lifestyle that looked like abundance and was built entirely on borrowed time and other people's money. The net — the actual take-home after obligations — was a concept he simply did not operate within. The taxes were owed. The penalties were stacking. And he was at a bar in another city, running a tab, swiping on Tinder, eating well, drinking better, and answering to no one.
When I found out about the tax debt — the full scope of it, the years of it — I asked him how it had happened. And he told me. His ex-wife had stolen all his money, which was why he couldn't pay. And then I had broken up with him, which was why he still couldn't pay. The IRS was not a consequence of his choices. The IRS was a consequence of the women in his life.
I want you to sit with that for a moment. Four years of unfiled returns. A debt that would take years to resolve. And the explanation — delivered with complete conviction — was that the women who had loved him were responsible for it.
This is the above-the-law mentality in its purest form. It is not just about taxes. It shows up in every obligation he ever had. Financial agreements made and quietly abandoned. Commitments offered and casually discarded. Accountability that never arrived, because accountability requires believing that the rules apply to you. And he did not believe that. He never had.
I want to be specific about what the lifestyle of an ODD adult looks like, because I think we tend to romanticize it from the outside. The spontaneity. The refusal to be pinned down. The person who lives fully in the present because the future is not their problem.
It is not romantic. It is eating and drinking. That is the whole operating system. Not building. Not planning. Not honoring the obligations that accumulate quietly in the background while the good times roll. Just the next meal, the next drink, the next bar in the next city, the next woman on the next app. Everything else — the taxes, the debt, the promises, the people who loved him — was noise.
The money that should have gone to the IRS went to the lifestyle. The lifestyle of a man who answers to no one. And when the bill finally came due, there was always a story ready. Always a villain. Always a reason that had nothing to do with him.
This is what reckless behavior looks like when it is not dramatic. It does not always look like a car crash or a criminal record or a public meltdown. Sometimes it looks like a man at a nice restaurant, ordering another bottle of wine, while the federal government quietly adds another year of penalties to a debt he has decided is not his problem.
There is a specific cruelty in loving someone with ODD that I do not think gets talked about enough. It is the blame transfer.
The ODD adult cannot hold accountability. It is not that they are unwilling — though they are. It is that the psychological architecture of the disorder makes self-blame feel like annihilation. So the blame has to go somewhere. And it almost always goes to the person closest to them.
His ex-wife stole his money. That is why the taxes weren't paid the first time. I broke up with him. That is why the taxes weren't paid this time. The narrative never changes. Only the names do.
What this does to the people who love them is profound and largely invisible. You start to carry a guilt that was never yours. You start to wonder if you really did cause it. You start to make excuses for them — to yourself, to other people — because the alternative is admitting that the person you love has constructed a reality in which they are never wrong, never responsible, never the author of their own consequences.
I have an excuse for him. I always had an excuse. The truth was harder to say out loud: he had done this before. He would do it again. The pattern did not begin with me and it would not end with me. I was just the most recent name in the story he told himself.
ODD does not appear from nowhere. The research is consistent: it almost always has a backstory. A home where the rules changed constantly. A parent whose authority was unpredictable — loving one day, punishing the next, absent the day after that. A childhood where defiance was not a disorder but a survival strategy.
The child who grows up in chaos learns, very early, that the people who make the rules cannot be trusted. That compliance does not protect you. That the only safe position is refusal — because at least refusal is yours. At least no one can take that from you.
The tragedy is that the strategy works, for a while. The defiant child survives. They get through. They develop a kind of armor that looks, from the outside, like strength. And then they grow up. And the armor stays on. And the world keeps asking them to take it off — to file their taxes, to honor their commitments, to be accountable to the people who love them — and they cannot do it. Not because they are bad people. Because they are people who never learned that authority could be safe.
What is harder to sit with is watching the pattern pass down. His daughter was raised in the same current. Every year, without fail, phone calls from her teachers. Problems in the classroom. Conflicts that never seemed to originate with her — it was always the teacher, always a misunderstanding, always someone else's fault. I could have accepted a difficult year. Children have difficult years. But this was every year. A new teacher, a new classroom, and within days the same friction would surface. Both parents received the calls. Both parents defended her. Neither one looked inward long enough to ask what they might be contributing to. And then it escalated beyond the classroom. She started running. Not once — multiple times. Sometimes she was gone for a day. Sometimes for several days at a stretch. No one knew where she was. The calls shifted from teachers to police. What was unfolding had a name — conduct disorder — a pattern of persistent behavior that violates the basic rights of others and defies age-appropriate social norms. Running away is one of its hallmarks. So is the refusal to be accountable, the disregard for rules, the escalating conflicts that always seem to be someone else's fault. They were not raising a child who struggled with authority. They were raising a child who had learned, from watching, that authority was the enemy — and that the people who loved you would always take your side against it. The armor was being fitted early.
Let me give you a small example. Because the big ones — the tax debt, the Tinder, the years of financial wreckage — those are easy to point to. But the disorder lives in the small moments too. Maybe more so.
I had been gardening in the backyard for hours. It was one of those days where you lose track of time in the dirt, the good kind of tired. My dog Lucy had left a pile behind the bed I was working in. He came outside and I said, simply, casually — the way you say anything to a person you live with — "Hey, can you pick up this poop so I don't step in it?"
He went off.
Not a little irritated. Not a sigh and an eye roll. He verbally assaulted me. Furious that I had asked him to do something he didn't want to do. You could see it the moment the words left my mouth — the flash across his face, the immediate irritation, the way a simple request landed on him like an accusation. I told him that the way he was speaking to me was abusive. He backed off. But he never apologized. Not once.
He lost his mind because I asked him to pick up a pile of dog shit.
That is what living with ODD looks like on a Tuesday afternoon. Not a crisis. Not a dramatic confrontation. Just a man who experiences every request as a demand, every ask as a power struggle, every small moment of normal partnership as an intolerable imposition on his autonomy. And when he explodes, it is your fault for asking. And when it is over, there is no repair. Because repair requires acknowledging that he was wrong. And he is never wrong.
There was another moment — one that captures the above-the-law mentality so perfectly that I still think about it.
He flew out to Florida to pick me up. We were going to drive cross-country back to California together — me, him, and Lucy. He had handled the hotel reservation for the first night. One problem: he had booked it for one pet. The hotel called him and made it clear that pets were not welcome. A reasonable person adjusts. Books somewhere else. Apologizes for the confusion.
He decided we would stay there anyway.
He had been told no. He had been told the rules. And he looked at those rules the way he looked at all rules — as suggestions that applied to other people. So we showed up. And the hotel manager asked us to leave. And he got into a screaming fight with the hotel staff in the lobby, in front of other guests, with Lucy on a leash beside us, because he was going to stay there regardless of whether we were welcome. The rules said no. He said no to the rules.
I was mortified. The kind of embarrassed that settles into your bones. The kind where you look at the person beside you and think: who is this?
We did not stay at that hotel. We ended up at a motel — the kind where people on parole and women working the street come and go through the night. The area was suspect. And parked outside, in that lot, in that neighborhood, was my Jeep — loaded with everything I owned. I was moving cross-country. Every belonging I had was in that vehicle, sitting outside in the dark in a place I would not have chosen in broad daylight. That was where his defiance landed us. Not at the nice hotel he had booked wrong and refused to leave gracefully. At a place I would not have chosen for Lucy, let alone for myself, let alone for everything I owned in the world.
He was not sorry. He was indignant. As far as he was concerned, the hotel had been unreasonable. The manager had been out of line. The rules about pets were the problem. Not the man who ignored them.
I almost bought a house with this man. I almost married him. The tax debt — the four years of it, the penalties, the liens — made that impossible. We could not qualify for a mortgage. We could not move forward. The life I had imagined was blocked by a consequence he had created long before I arrived and blamed on everyone but himself.
Thank God.
I mean that without irony. The chaos that was supposed to be our shared problem became the wall that kept me out of a life that would have buried me. The tax debt that he blamed on me was, in the end, the thing that saved me. Sometimes the recklessness does you a favor. Not because it was meant to. But because the consequences of living above the law eventually become impossible to ignore, even for the people who love the person creating them.
The cost of loving someone with ODD is not always dramatic. It is not always a crisis or a confrontation or a moment of reckoning. Sometimes it is just a slow accumulation of excuses. A gradual erosion of your own sense of reality. A growing suspicion that the story you are being told does not quite match the evidence in front of you.
What I learned — slowly, over years, through a long history of being groomed into compliance — was to stop asking. Not for the big things. For anything. The most ordinary request became a calculation: is this worth the risk? Is this worth what it might cost me? You stop asking him to pick something up. You stop asking him to follow through. You stop asking, period. Because you have learned, in the way that people learn things they were never supposed to have to learn, that even the most basic ask can be the thing that sets him off. That is not a relationship. That is a hostage negotiation you have agreed to call love.
And then one day you do the math. Four years. Not a mistake. Not an oversight. A pattern. A choice, made over and over again, by a person who had decided that the rules were for other people. And you realize that you were never going to change that. You were only ever going to be the next name in the story.
ODD is treatable. Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, and trauma-informed approaches can all make a meaningful difference — but only when the person recognizes the pattern and genuinely wants to change it.
This is the hardest part. Getting someone with ODD to accept help feels like asking them to comply. Which triggers the very disorder you are trying to treat. The suggestion that they might need therapy is experienced as an accusation. The idea that their behavior has a pattern is experienced as an attack. The person who loves them and tries to name what is happening is experienced as the enemy.
Change is possible. I believe that. But it requires the person to choose it — not be forced into it, not be shamed into it, not be loved into it. It requires them to look at the wreckage of their own choices and decide, finally, that the rules were not the problem. That the exemption they claimed was never real. That the people they blamed were not responsible for the consequences they created.
Some people get there. Many do not.
I know now that I was not the reason his taxes went unpaid. I know that his ex-wife was not the reason either. I know that the traveling and the bar tabs and the Tinder dates and the lifestyle built on gross income instead of net — that was the reason. That was always the reason.
I know that loving someone is not the same as being responsible for them. I know that excuses are not explanations. I know that a pattern repeated across multiple relationships, multiple years, multiple women, is not bad luck. It is a choice.
And I know this: the most heartbreaking thing about defiance is that it looks like strength from the outside. It is not. It is a child who learned that the world was not safe, and never stopped believing it. Who built a life on the premise that the rules were the enemy — and spent decades paying the price for it, and making sure that everyone around them paid it too.
You cannot love someone out of a disorder they do not know they have.
But you can love yourself enough to stop waiting for them to change.
Medication does not cure the disease. It just masks the symptoms.
On The Above-the-Law Mentality
“Think about someone in your life who operated by their own rules — someone for whom the normal agreements of a relationship did not seem to apply. Write about what it cost you to keep adjusting to their exceptions. And what it felt like the first time you stopped.”
Mayo Clinic Staff. (2023, January 4). Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) — Symptoms and causes. Mayo Clinic. Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) — Symptoms and causes
Nock, M. K., Kazdin, A. E., Hiripi, E., & Kessler, R. C. (2007). Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(7), 703–713. Lifetime prevalence, correlates, and persistence of oppositional defiant disorder
Oppositional Defiant Disorder. (2024, October 29). In StatPearls. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Oppositional Defiant Disorder — StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf
Mission Connection Healthcare. (2024). 5 Signs of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Adults. Mission Connection Healthcare Blog. 5 Signs of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Adults
Continue the Series
The story continues in Read Part Forty-Two →
Be the first to share your thoughts